it's a vain pursuit but it helps me to sleep ([info]rezendi) wrote,
@ 2004-10-28 19:50:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:essay, writing

But enough about me. Let's talk about what you can do for me.
With National Novel Writing Month coming up, various friends and LJ-friends of mine are gearing up to write novels. This disturbs me greatly. Please stop. Eighteen months ago, I somehow stumbled and tumbled into a paying gig as a full-time novelist, and let me tell you, it's a damn cushy job - but it's also fraught with risk. If I don't sell books, I'll be back out on the street, or worse yet, in the office. And the competition is killing me. Every time someone walks into a bookstore, I'm already fighting for their attention with Margaret Atwood, Dan Brown, John Le Carre, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Haruki Murakami, J.K. Rowling, Salman Rushdie, the list goes on forever. You think I want that list any longer? You think I want more competition? No freakin' way.

There's this perception of the publishing business as a walled garden, protected by moats and spiky walls, whose denizens are for the most part actively hostile to wannabe writers and their attempts to break in. This perception is one thousand per cent correct. And now that I'm inside the garden, dammit, I want y'all to stay out where you belong. But the walls are far from impregnable, and if you all keep writing, there's a real danger that you'll come in and push me out. There's only room for so many. So please, allow me to humbly suggest a few rules for you all to follow so's I can stay here in the pink of my largely undeserved and very jammy existence.

Of course they don't apply to everyone. There are exceptions; there are always exceptions; there's always Harper Lee. But if everyone follows these rules carefully, I should be able to continue bathing in caviar for the rest of my days. Please help.



1. Don't Have Talent

Maybe you just can't hear the music. If this applies to you, stop now, don't bother reading the rest - but please, whatever you do, don't stop writing. Au contraire, please, I beseech thee, write like GK Chesterton and Isaac Asimov's genespliced son or daughter. Stay up every night dreaming of the power, money, and public adulation that will be yours when your genius is finally realized. Write a hundred pages a week, a novel a month, and - this is the important part - flood publishers with queries and manuscripts. Try to get your friends to do the same. Now that I'm on the other side of the transom, I want those slush piles mounting to Mars, I want the good manuscripts to be needles in a haystack the size of the Gobi Desert. Please, oh talentless ones, please. You're not my only hope, but you are the most effective.


2. Do NaNoWriMo

Offhand I can't think of any better way to turn potential competition into nonwriters than by having them do NaNoWriMo.

First, it's a false gimmick. 50,000 words is not a novel. It should be, and fifty years ago it would have been, but Novel Size has bloated, and books today must be big. (Yes, there are exceptions, there are always exceptions.) My first published novel started at 75,000 words, and this concerned my publisher greatly; even fattened out to 90,000, they thought it scrawny.

Second, writing that much in a month while working full-time is hard. That's how much I write in a month, when I'm writing, and I write fast, and I write full-time (well, part-time, 25 hrs/week. I told you it was cushy). Writing is like anything else: if you try and do too much of it when you're already half-drained, the quality of what you produce goes way down. This makes it very likely that NaNoWriMo's result will be sufficiently crappy that it will be no good either for expansion or revision. First drafts can and often should be bad, yes, but dreadful is often impossible to fix.

Third, a NaNoWriMo book will be such a draining hassle to produce that the writer will have strong negative associations with novel-writing for a long time thereafter - especially if they fail to finish. Even if they 'succeed', they're not likely to think much of their own abilities when they reread their output. This kind of negative experience ought to keep dozens of otherwise capable writers off bookstore shelves, praise the Lord.


3. Don't Read

A writer who doesn't read is like a carpenter without wood. And that's the way I want you. But if you must read, fine, but read, say, one or two books a month, and make sure that they're almost always the same type of thing. For God's sake don't read fiction, nonfiction, highbrow, lowbrow, Nobel Prize winners, glossy paperback thrillers, young adult adventure, devastating character studies, scripts, poetry, newspapers, essays, and every so often a book just because it's the kind of book you don't normally read. Because that would be trouble.


4. Don't Write

There are those who don't actually want to write, they just want to be writers. I love you, you're perfect, don't ever change.

Then there are Idea People, who come up with story ideas and think that this is some kind of big deal, and treat the actual writing as a kind of connect-the-dots monkey-job. Don't ever tell these folks that when it comes to writing, ideas, all ideas, are cheap and worthless. It's only the execution that counts. Let them be convinced that some day they'll bother doing the gruntwork. It's kinder to everyone, really.

Related are those with Grandiose Plans, the people who have ten-volume fantasy epics 'all plotted out' but have never written more than the first fifty pages and disconnected bits and scraps, because somehow they find themselves replotting and rescheduling and weaving new characters into their Grandiose Plans rather than actually writing anything, because of course their plans have to be perfect before they can ever actually write the eight thousand pages, which of course they'll never do. Please, if you have such plans, perfect them, or scrap them and come up with a nine-volume science fiction epic (one book for every planet in the solar system) instead, and don't ever, ever, think of starting with something small.

There are so many other ways not to write. Writer's Block, for instance; it's not you, it's your condition. Or the need to research every little thing about your historical period before you start writing about it, and I do mean every little thing. Or work only when you're Inspired, when your Muse is visiting, by which you mean, in fits and starts, and never to completion.

But of course they all boil down to a failure to apply the seat of the pants to the seat of the chair. And write something, regardless of how little you're so inclined, how many distractions leap to mind. And again. And again. And again. On a schedule. Whether you feel like it or not. I beg you, don't do that. And if you do do that, at least don't make it a real priority in your life. I don't ever want to hear you saying "I'm sorry, I can't come to the movie/make it to the party/have dinner with you, I'm writing tonight." Because if you start saying things like that, you've become dangerous.

The rule of thumb is that most writers - most talented writers - have a million bad words in them before they start writing good ones. A million. That's four thousand pages. That's ten novels. There are exceptions. There are always exceptions. But if that number seems unthinkably huge, you may not be a writer. If you're pushing thirty and you haven't yet written an entire novel, you may not be a writer. Because, you see, what writers do is, they write.


5. Don't Finish What You Write

About a hundred pages in, that's where it usually hits: that's the point where all the inspiring ideas and images have been stained by ordinariness, tarnished by their translation from dreams to words, and the story seems stupid, and the characters vapid, or even if the setup looks good - and it probably does, because setup is easy - the payoff doesn't seem worth writing any more, and it's all so banal and pointless that it's really best to just stop, because now you've got this other idea buzzing around in your head, and it's really amazing, clearly better than this piece of crap, no sense throwing good money after bad, law of diminishing returns, let's write this off as an educational experience and move onto the real story, the good story, shall we? Yes. Let's.

Or maybe you just have trouble with story structure, so you don't know how to move from the beginning to the middle. Or maybe you can't do endings. I sympathize. Endings, as Elmore Leonard says, are hard.

Even if you get to THE END, just remember one thing: it's not ready. In fact, it's never going to be ready. You have to revise it until it's perfect, perfect. And it's never going to be perfect. Like Continuity in Mona Lisa Overdrive, you will be working on your novel, and you will always be working on your novel. And I will be over here, smiling.


6. Fall In Love With Your Work

Hemingway famously said "The thing a writer needs most is a first-rate bullshit detector." I assume he was talking about reading your own work. And boy, was he right.

You may find, when rereading your own work, that you hear two voices, like the famous angel and devil on your shoulders, murmuring to you. You may not have these voices. You may have them but not hear them - in which case, rock on, stay deaf. But in case you hear them, this is what they do: when you reach certain passages, Voice 1 will quietly mutter something like "I don't know about this bit," after which Voice 2 will emphatically shout it down: "Are you crazy? This is perfect! This is the best part of the book! The bit about the vines on the wall is an amazing symbolic analogy for the way his family has stifled him! And just listen to the way it reads, it practically skips off the tongue, it's prose poetry, for God's sake, if you save anything from this book, save this passage!"

I want you to listen to me very carefully. Ignore Voice 1. Voice 1 is always wrong. Listen to Voice 2, and only Voice 2, and you and me, we're going to get along just fine.

And know this: If you finish a novel, you've done something amazing, something incredible, something momentous. Bask in it. Print it out and stare at the stack of paper. Wait a couple months without writing anything, to catch your breath. And again, after you've done the second draft. Think about sequels, or affiliated short stories. Do not, repeat not, shrug, catalogue its many flaws, mutter "OK, onto the next, maybe this one will be better," and the very next day, start a new one.


7. Write Short Stories

I feel bad about this one, because I love short stories. But honestly? From a professional standpoint, in today's market? You go and write all the short stories you like. Hell, get 'em published. I don't care. I don't think you're Alice Munro or Jhumpa Lahiri. I don't think anyone's going to give a shit. You may, may, get a tiny fraction of a microsecond more attention from an agent or publisher if you can mention that you've had stories published in Literary Quarterly or what have you, and this does work to your advantage - but I'm pretty damn sure that this is outweighed by the opportunity cost of spending all that time and effort working on stories instead of novels, where the money's at. I'm sorry. I hate to say it. But nobody reads the damn things any more. So if they're what float your boat, my condolences, best of luck, I fear you not even a little.


8. Don't Send Out What You Write

Be afraid. Be very afraid. Because if you finish what you write, then you might have to do something with it. You're going to have to show it to people. You're going to have to risk crushing, soul-destroying rejection. Are you ready for that? Are you? Don't you think you want to do one more pass? Don't you want to show it to your workshop one more time? How about a new workshop? You've only got one chance to make the all-important first impression. Is it ready? Is it really ready? Are you sure? I didn't think so.

If you get this far and stick, I'm a little worried, as there's still a chance that you might get hit by a truck or off yourself (occupational hazard) and your heirs will send out your masterpiece instead, a la John Kennedy O'Toole (well, sort of, his story was complicated). But it's only a slim chance; publishers will tell you that first novels, even the ones with immense promise, almost always need rewriting.


9. Don't Understand The Business

Don't be professional. Don't understand that it's a business. Query agents who don't accept queries; send manuscripts to those who want queries first. Phone them. Repeatedly. Send humble, self-effacing query letters in which you all but cringe before their all-powerful might. Or tell them that you have a guaranteed NYT bestseller. Be mystified by the way in which all your friends and acquaintances love your writing, while the publishing Powers That Be keep rejecting it, and tell yourself that it's all an incestuous sucker game and you have to know someone to break in. Don't understand that when the general population reads something, they're looking for reasons to like it, whereas when an agent or publisher reads a submission from a no-name, they are looking for a reason to reject it, and it's your job to prevent them from seeing any such reason.

Or decide that agents seem like a waste of time - why try to jump two bars when you can jump one? - and go straight to publishers instead. Sometimes it works. There are exceptions. There are always exceptions.

Or schmooze. Go to writers' conferences. Meet agents. Sign up to feed your money into the the vast crud of the Would-Be Writer industry. You know what? It may work. But if you've got a good book, you don't need to schmooze. Yes, if you're good at sales, and if you haunt the wannabe circuit, you can eventually sell a mediocre book - but I'm arrogant enough that I'm not worried about those.

It's the good books that frighten me. Keep them out of the bookstores. Please. My future depends on it. Help me, teeming masses struggling to cut me off at the knees, you're my only hope.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]m4dh4tt3r
2004-10-28 06:17 pm UTC (link)
pure genius.

(Reply to this)


[info]rednikki
2004-10-28 06:17 pm UTC (link)
Great advice. Thank you.

(Reply to this)


[info]el_christador
2004-10-28 07:05 pm UTC (link)
About a hundred pages in, that's where it usually hits: that's the point where all the inspiring ideas and images have been stained by ordinariness, tarnished by their translation from [...]
no sense throwing good money after bad, law of diminishing returns, let's write this off as an educational experience and move onto the real story, the good story, shall we? Yes. Let's.

I don't know, sometimes I think Neal Stephenson should have done this. Or, more realistically, he should have learned to write middles and endings that live up to his beginnings instead of being lengthy anticlimaxes. But I haven't read anything of his after Cryptonomicon, maybe he's learned to.

Maybe writing ought to be like pitching, with starters, relievers and closers. Books could be sold as "Begun by Neal Stephenson, finished by Barbara Gowdy", say. (I don't know if Ms. Gowdy's a good closer. I haven't read anything of hers. But she's highly photogenic, and that's good enough for me.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lrc
2004-10-29 10:51 pm UTC (link)
I just finished the Baroque Cycle. It's excellent, and he's even learned how to write an ending. There are no major surprises, but after nearly 3000 pages, you don't need any major surprises. It also doesn't just come crashing to a halt in 30 pages, like a lot of his books do.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]trinker, 2004-10-30 05:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lrc, 2004-10-30 05:45 pm UTC

[info]feyandstrange
2004-10-28 08:13 pm UTC (link)
It is too late to save me, you know. But don't worry; I'm not targeting your genre, and I owe you a book blurb or two.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rezendi
2004-10-28 10:12 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I had you pegged as a lost cause a long time ago.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tyellas
2004-10-28 08:16 pm UTC (link)
-laughing and laughing- I know plenty of folks who are already following your advice. Right now I'm having the painful experience of seeing a friend of mine who's a three-time-published novelist (not the same market as you) hamstrung by some of these very issues. I especially agree with you about NaNoWriMo - I've seen two or three aspiring writers wash out and become permanently discouraged.

(Reply to this)


[info]digitalsidhe
2004-10-28 09:42 pm UTC (link)
Re: NaNoWriMo: I think many of your points are right on target. I recall that either last year or the year before, [info]feyandstrange was considering doing NaNoWriMo. I recall advising her, fairly strongly, not to try to get an entire novel done in only a month. I advised her to take two, at least (starting at the beginning of October), and let it hang over into December if needed. In short, I tried to get her to use it as a crutch and a spur, where possible/necessary, but not to let it become a limit.

I wonder if you think such an approach would help much?

Also, this whole essay is pretty damn cool. Would you mind having it published on Freak Nation? (It can include links to Dark Places on Amazon, your personal site if any, and suchlike; FN has no problem with contributors whoring out their other stuff.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rezendi
2004-10-28 10:16 pm UTC (link)
such an approach

Yes. Writing a full novel in three months, or a short novel in two, is reasonable and admirable.

mind having it published

Not at all, except oops - being fond of it myself, I just sent it out to Slate, Salon, the SFBG, and the Village Voice. In the extremely likely event that they all turn me down (it's a fun piece, but my timing is bad, and advice-for-writers articles are a nickel a score), then by all means. I'll let you know in a few weeks.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]digitalsidhe, 2004-10-28 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redheadedmuse, 2004-10-29 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rezendi, 2004-10-29 09:09 am UTC

[info]redheadedmuse
2004-10-28 10:19 pm UTC (link)
thanks. I needed that.

(Reply to this)

Sorry.
[info]seawasp
2004-10-28 11:03 pm UTC (link)
I have not yet reached full-time status. So I must ruthlessly crush all those in my way who might possibly impede my progress to that status.

The newer, weaker writers... such as, oh, yourself... will be easier to deal with than the Rowlings.

Nothing personal, of course, but I will have to shove all aside until my slice of the pie amounts to enough to support myself and my family.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Sorry.
[info]rezendi
2004-10-29 09:10 am UTC (link)
That sounds entirely fair. "Publishing red in tooth and claw" and all that. Shall we eliminate the preliminaries? Dawn tomorrow, Columbus Circle, pistols for two and coffee for one? :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Sorry. - [info]matociquala, 2004-10-29 08:37 pm UTC

[info]rdi
2004-10-29 01:55 am UTC (link)
Pure dead brilliant.

(Reply to this)


[info]hitchhiker
2004-10-29 06:51 am UTC (link)
Bravo!

(Reply to this)


[info]douglain
2004-10-29 09:00 pm UTC (link)
I've written nothing but short stories, but I did manage to sell a collection, and now I'm writing a novel.

So, I think you're wrong to discount the story writers. It's a good way to hone your craft. Right? Right?

Oh I'm just doomed aren't I?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]snickerpuss
2004-10-30 12:52 am UTC (link)
I love reading collections of short stories. So keep writing 'em, please.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]tapedeck, 2004-10-30 06:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rezendi, 2004-10-30 08:29 am UTC

[info]arcaedia
2004-10-29 09:05 pm UTC (link)
Marvelous! Now I am thoroughly encouraged to spend my entire weekend reading slush in the hopes of finding a great work.

(Reply to this)

Haha! Fear me!
[info]hunter5654
2004-10-29 09:43 pm UTC (link)
I am that which you fear -- I write! I'm a full time word-pumping, editor-loving, market-driven author, and I will replace you on the shelves! (If you're on a fantasy shelf, that is!) Well, okay, if you ask nice, we can share the shelf... :D

Brilliant, btw. I love it!

C

(Reply to this)


[info]sclerotic_rings
2004-10-29 10:18 pm UTC (link)
I swear, my ex-wife used each and every one of your tips. (The only one you forgot was to blame everyone else for the reason you can't get off your ass and write: whether it's because the windows in the writing room aren't right, or that the computer isn't fast enough, or that your college roommate was rejected on one of her stories, so there's no reason to continue. My ex went through excuse after excuse as to why she couldn't write, but then got so painfully jealous of the fact that I was that she gained the nickname "The Nancy Spungen of fandom" whenever she'd attend conventions. She finally settled on her complete inability to get away from the television on "depression", and she was right: light itself had troubles escaping the depression her butt left in the couch cushion. Hence, the reason why she's now an "ex".)

(Reply to this)


[info]britgeekgrrl
2004-10-29 10:25 pm UTC (link)
I needed this. You're brilliant.

(Reply to this)


[info]jonquil
2004-10-29 11:16 pm UTC (link)
If you're pushing thirty and you haven't yet written an entire novel, you may not be a writer.

I was thoroughly enjoying your diatribe when I came to this line. It's fairly common for women not to start writing until they've finished raising their families. Harriet Doerr's first novel, "Stones for Ibarra", came out when she was 68. Jeanne Ray's first novel, "Step-Ball-Change", came out after her daughter, Ann Patchett, passed the MS on to her own agent.

May I suggest, instead, "You're too young to write a novel; you haven't lived yet. You're too old to write a novel; you should have started practicing younger." That should cover everybody.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rezendi
2004-10-30 08:31 am UTC (link)
Good point. Given those circumstances, the pushing-thirty line is probably unfair.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ladyeuthanasia, 2004-11-01 11:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rezendi, 2004-11-01 11:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyeuthanasia, 2004-11-01 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyeuthanasia, 2004-11-10 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rezendi, 2004-11-12 08:11 pm UTC

[info]serenejournal
2004-10-29 11:59 pm UTC (link)
Brilliant!

(Reply to this)

Ouch
[info]sailorjim
2004-10-30 01:19 am UTC (link)
Oh well, nice to finally get some good advice ... trouble is, I don't seem to have a full novel in me.

(Reply to this)


[info]mad_chatter
2004-10-30 05:59 am UTC (link)
I really liked this post. Very cool.

(Reply to this)


[info]rfrancis
2004-10-30 06:15 am UTC (link)
A. Friendslisted you.

B. Realized I was being an idiot and withdrew from NaNoWriMo, which I've even done before in 2001, following which I wrote basically nothing for two years. Uh huh.

-R

(Reply to this)

A NaNoWriMo Dissent
[info]wordweaverlynn
2004-10-30 06:39 am UTC (link)
Many of the points you make are excellent, and I agree with almost all of them. Read. Write. Finish. Edit. Submit. Know the business.

But I'm a professional writer with a number of published books to my credit, and I love doing NaNo. Trust me, grad school is *worse*. If getting an MA in Creative Writing couldn't discourage me, nothing can. (For the record, I'd already published two books when I went to grad school.)

I found my local writers' group through NaNo. They're great people. We meet year-round, encourage each other, share the little writing victories. One member just made her first sale; [info]layer is a writer of serious literary fiction, as well as a sort of uber-Municipal Liaison who works closely with Chris Baty. Several of the others keep sending out stories. One just won a prize at a writers' conference -- and she's about to send out her finished novel to the agents she met there. Several others have published stories since we all started writing together.

NaNo has helped me get past that nasty internal critic that says a hundred pages in, "Read this shit? No thanks, I'd rather pry out my eyeballs with a paper knife." Once the first dreadful draft is down, I can polish it into perfection. I'm still doing serious work on the two previous projects, and I'm very excited about my idea for this one.

Sure, it's not for everyone. I can see how someone might burn out doing it. But it can be a memorable experience, and for some of us, it has led to good writing.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: A NaNoWriMo Dissent
[info]rezendi
2004-10-30 09:07 am UTC (link)
I love doing NaNo

Huh. Well, jeez, more power to you.

Trust me, grad school is *worse*.

I believe it. I'm not sure how I feel about creative writing MFA programs. But hey, David Foster Wallace, they can't be all bad.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Smart people with dumb ideas
[info]earthdog
2004-10-30 10:16 am UTC (link)
It's the good books that frighten me. Keep them out of the bookstores. Please. My future depends on it. Help me, teeming masses struggling to cut me off at the knees, you're my only hope.

A rising tide lifts all boats. A crowded market place is not your problem. You want people to read more and more. Good books it what draws people into bookstores. It is people reading bad books that should frighten you.

(Reply to this)


[info]kateo
2004-10-30 12:26 pm UTC (link)
Found this through a link in someone else's journal. I love it!

As a struggling songwriter in Nashville, I can tell you that a great deal of what you've written crosses over into other writing disciplines, too. So I'd agree with the comment above about targeting a writer-oriented publication for this piece.

One other piece of "advice" I'd add if this were to be modified for the Nashville crowd is: "Give advice. Give lots of advice, whether anyone asked you or not. Hey, you know that you know what you're talking about, and who cares if the beneficiary of your advice already has three #1s and an ASCAP award under his/her belt? The important thing is, you're showing how much you know."

Gosh, I wish I had three #1s and an ASCAP award. Guess I better get back to writing. :-)

(Reply to this)


[info]kaiberie
2004-10-30 03:02 pm UTC (link)
I did the nano last year. Its out at agents, and is garnering interest, and it's a book that'd scare you. Not because *I* think it's good, but becuase the feedback is great. It DID need close to double it's flesh added once I finished it in the Nano. I never thought for one minute that it WOULD be finished at the end of November. but it WAS a rush, so much so that this year I'm doing two.

Good commentary though.

(Reply to this)


[info]cooperati
2004-10-30 06:30 pm UTC (link)
shamelessly, shamelessly, i openly admit this applies to me in hundreds of stated and implied ways.

my thanks. and, truthfully, this article won't offer any inspiration, but to continue the path i have chosen. it reiterates my longstanding expectation that my story will be done in 20 years.

if even then.

i liked it.

now, who are you?

-=T=-

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rezendi
2004-11-01 06:02 pm UTC (link)
uh, I'm just this guy, you know?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…